February 7 19

January 27 10

January 22 10

January 11 10

December 24 09

December 21 09

November 29 09

November 21 09

October 26 09

October 9 09

September 25 09

September 9 2009

September 1 2009

June 9 2009

June 2 2009

May 27 2009

May 18 2009

May 12 2009

May 7 2009

April 29 2009

April 22 2009

April 15 2009

April 11 2009

March 29 2009

March 25 2009

March 20 2009

March 13 2009

March 1 2009

February 24 2009

February 17 2009

February 14 2009

February 9 2009

February 7 2009

February 1 2009

January 30 2009

January 24 2009

January 20 2009

January 19 2009

January 17 2009

January 15 2009

January 13 2009

original format


Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Is the World Really Ready for President elect Palin?







Ann Coulter, yummy yummy. yummy yummy yummy yummy Ann coulter!

Ann Coulter, the Republican Parties Designated SpokesSkeleton!








Hail to the Sheep!






Rock on Little Camper!

Click Me, You Know You Want to






ah, but to live the life of o'reilly

Bow to Your Moral Superior






i'm not rappaport

Develop a Rapport with the Colbert Report









It Seems as Though Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is Ready to Play With the Big Boys. Let Me Know How That Works Out For You. Sarah Palin on Family Guy: Not a Fan

Tehran, Iran (CNN) -- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad warned the United States and other nations Tuesday not to impose tougher sanctions in reaction to the Islamic country's nuclear ambitions.

The enriched Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is what you might call a dichotomy. On the one hand, he insists Iran's nuclear program is entirely peaceful. Then, on the other, he is quite the threatening little fellow. Observe:

"We prefer that they move in the spirit of cooperation. It won't put us in trouble. They themselves will get into trouble." Make up your mind Mahmoud, you're either peaceful or you aren't. He then clarified his threat by saying something cryptic, "Definitely, we will show a reaction that will put them to shame, like always," he said. Do you see why the international community is trying to keep you from getting nukes, Mahmoud? You are either just another tyrannical dictator who calls himself president or you're becoming a tool of the Revolutionary Guard, or, & hear me out on this, you're an asshole.

Whatever he is, things don't look good for him right now. It's not as if the U.S. are the only ones that don't want Iran to have nukes & Hillary Clinton is insisting that military action is not even being considered right now.

"No, we are planning to bring the world community together in applying pressure to Iran through sanctions adopted by the United Nations that will be particularly aimed at those enterprises controlled by the Revolutionary Guard, which we believe is, in effect, supplanting the government of Iran. We see that the government of Iran, the supreme leader, the president, the parliament, is being supplanted, and that Iran is moving toward a military dictatorship. Now, that is our view." But, you can't tell me that there haven't been some heavy talks in regard to military action & you can believe that is not something Ahmadinejad wants. Though, all his posturing indicates otherwise.

If he is a pragmatic man, he is surely taking several factors into consideration,

1) How prepared is his military for an invasion & no doubt, long & protracted occupation by the U.S. & it's allies? (& unlike, Iraq, the U.S. is not going to have any trouble bringing many allies on board to stop Iran from hooking up nukes for themselves, because this is a real cause, George W Puppet.) It isn't as though Barack Obama's dad has any personal beef with Ahmadinejad like H.W. had with Saddam Hussein, Obama at least has the interest of national & international security @ the forefront of his thinking. 2) Has the U.S. learned any lessons from the multiple occupations of Iraq & Afghanistan & if it is decided that military action is necessary, will we pussyfoot around with inadequate troop levels or will we come @ them with full force & shut down their way of life all @ once instead of letting it drag out for years? How long can he afford to have his country under siege until he finally a) gives in & caves to the international pressure? or b) is forced into hiding in caves while Iran is destroyed by the people he is currently threatening? 3) How long can his country exist in it's current state if more sanctions are levied against it? 4) Without nukes, how big of a threat is Iran, really? Does he have a number of nukes stashed away that he is prepared to launch @ us like Kim Jong Il? Or does he truly believe all of his threats really intimidate not only the U.S., but the entire international community? I don't want to make light of this obviously ultra delicate situation, but what a dumb ass. He's counting on Obama to back off because he's a peaceful man, but he forgets that when it comes to foreign policy, Hillary has a much bigger Johnson, & she's not afraid to swing it.

Obviously, Mahmoud, the entire world is dead set against you having nukes, so what're you gonna' do? If you really want nuclear power solely for energy & medical purposes, you will comply with the U.N. resolutions & send your uranium out for enrichment like you're supposed to. If you could get on board with that, I think you'd have a much easier time of it & the world would not have to be so worried about you all the time. Now, I can understand why you are pissed off @ being shackled like this. You're thinking, who do these assholes think they are? All the countries threatening to cut us off all have stockpiles of nukes. Who are they to tell me my country can't have them? Why indeed? Of course, he wouldn't sugar coat it as I had. But you see, that's the problem with asking yourself rhetorical questions Mahmoud, you already know the answers. No one in their right mind is going to just give you that kind of power. You may wind up with it eventually, but it's not going to be without a major struggle, a struggle that will no doubt still be raging long after the revolutionary coup that's going to oust your out of your office & put you in front on a firing squad. So, put that in your hookah pipe & shmoke it Jack, & just accept the fact that all your threats aren ot really scaring anyone, they're just assuring that you'll never get a big, nuclear stick to play with if you don't already have one. Better luck next time, Bucko.

& hey presto, looky here, the day after I wrote this, check out what was on CNN.com. I would say I hate being right all the time, but I don't.

Hey, anyone watch Family Guy last week? In the latest episode, Chris (voiced by Seth Green) dated a girl named Ellen with Down syndrome (voiced by Andrea Fay Friedman). But, it portrayed her not as mentally defective, as you might expect from Family Guy, but as a bossy, manipulative bitch, who said that her mother was the former governor of Alaska. This was obviously a shot @ Sarah Palin, who actually has a son named Trig with Down syndrome & was not too pleased with the way the character was portrayed. Palin, who is supposedly a champion for kids with the disability, had all sorts of predictable things to say about Family Guy & it's creator, Seth McFarlane.

She said that the Family Guy show really isn’t funny and was the work of cruel, cold-hearted people. Sarah Palin's daughter Bristol has written that the Family Guy writers were mocking my brother & my family, and called them heartless jerks. They've so far failed to acknowledge, however, that the actress who voiced Ellen, has Down syndrome herself & is able to make light of it. I could understand if they made her character a sterotypically drooling retarded person falling all over herself but they just made her a bitch, & maybe that's what hit Palin the hardest, being hypocritical & a semi functional human being herself. She wrote the book on the retarded double standard, which is pretty cool, considering we've only just learned that she knows how to read...off of her hand. Plus, she named her son Trig, is that short for Trigger or Trigonometry? Neither one being a suitable name for a baby, let alone one with a mentally debillitating syndrome. Now, you may label me as hateful after reading this, but hey, I don't really care. I am more in Amanda Fay Friedman's corner than Sarah Palins'. I, like virtually everyone else, including Family Guy creator, Seth Mcfarlane, don't know Trig or anything about him, so how could anyone really presume that they were making fun of him, personally? He's just a completely innocent little guy who I'm sure is adorable & very special in more ways than just having Down syndrome, but has in no way earned any ridicule, like his mother has & continues to. Did Family Guy go too far? Sure, but they always do. The show would have never reached the level of success they enjoy by not completely skewering anyone & everyone so this really should come as no surprise. The butt of the joke was Sarah Palin, who likes to believe that she lives on the moral high ground, but isn't intelligent enough to realize what's really going on. Or, she does realize it but is using it yet again as an opportunity to capitalize on this, politically. As long as I'm going down that road, I have to submit that if Amanda Fay Friedman, the actress afflicted with Down syndrome wasn't offended by it Sarah, then what gives you the right? Look in the mirror & ask yourself that question & quit using your baby as a fucking political prop & maybe people will stop making fun of you. Okay, they won't ever stop making fun of you, but @ least they might start taking you seriously. Well, not seriously, but your name will certainly become legend. Well, perhaps not legend, but it'll never fail to get a big laugh.

You know Sarah, I was going to say that you're never going to be president unless you develop a thicker skin, but instead, I believe I'll just say that you're never
going to be president. You seem like you're probably a nice enough person, but you're in way over your head & @ some point you will need to realize that the Republican's would just like to install you in the white house as a figurehead & a puppet for more of their corporatism. Think about that, if you know what it even means. Buh bye.